A judgement as to how well a phenomenological analysis has been verified; phenomenological verification is based on fulfillment, in which a less evident conscious process is fulfilled and clarified by a more evident one. For example, seeing the multiple possibilities inherent in a noema is more adequate than seeing only a single possibility, but the adequacy of the multiple possibilities is built on the apodicticity of the individual possibilities (i.e., we must be able to repeat the experience of each possibility). Thus the foundation of adequacy is apodicticity.