The process of assessing and interpreting evidence systematically considering its validity, results, and relevance. For more information, consult the User's Guides.
Critical appraisal considers research in terms of: quality (methods used to minimise bias in study design) relevance (outcome measures used and applicability of study results to other treatments, settings and patients) strength (magnitude, precision and reproducibility of results). (Gowing, 2001).
The process of assessing and interpreting medical research results systematically paying particular attention to their validity and relevance.
The fair assessment of research literature, judging the validity of results and conclusions, the contribution to scientific knowledge and the populations to which the conclusions can be applied. A basic tool to aid evidence-based health care.
A systematic review of a research report, using a standardised appraisal tool, to determine the quality of the paper (level of evidence, precision, etc) and its relevance to the question being asked.
Interpreting the strengths and weaknesses of the research process and applying judgements to practice